Get the FLASH PLAYER to view this magazine:
- or -
View as HTML version
6 Thinking the Future I
Chris Bosse’s aim is to
shift the boundaries of
structure and architecture.
By using wraparound
membranes, he
can transform the faceless
office blocks of the
concrete era into sustainable
and habitable
low-energy buildings.
The tower’s new façade
The “tower skin” will attractively package the outmoded
administration block of Sydney’s University of Technology.
Chris Bosse’s architectural practice is called the Laboratory
for Visionary Architecture (LAVA) — and his latest project has
“lava” written all over it. Generally referred to as the ugliest
building in Sydney, the Broadway Tower is a 32 storey administration
block belonging to the University of Technology (UTS).
Also known as the UTS Tower, it is now slated for a spectacular
makeover. By night it will then shimmer on the Sidney skyline as
though moulten rock were gliding down its surface. Alternatively,
the university will be able to use the façade as a giant display
surface for a changing series of graphic designs.
Built in 1969, the Broadway Tower has been blasted by
its critics as pompous, arrogant and detested ever since its cornerstone
was laid. The planned facelift, however, should put
an end to the vilifi cation. LAVA proposes to wrap a special membrane
around the existing building by means of a special steel
framework construction. This so-called “tower skin” is a light
and fl exible composite mesh textile made of nylon and ethylene
tetrafl uoroethylene (ETFE). The surface tension of the membrane
will make it stretch snugly around the walls and the roof
elements of the building, thus achieving maximum visual impact
with a minimal usage of materials.
Once in place, this cocoon will serve a number of purposes:
aesthetic, by giving the 1960’s concrete façade a much-needed
revamp; technical, by creating a microclimate beneath the membrane
that will serve to improve the building’s lighting and ventilation;
communicatory, by using LEDs on the outer skin to transmit
all kinds of messages; and, fi nally, ecological, by collecting
energy like a huge array of solar panels and channelling rainwater
for re-use.
The idea has quickly attracted admirers, and the UK’s
The Independent newspaper is already wondering whether
LAVA might not be willing to sheathe the Barbican Centre in
London or even the entire central district of Croydon in a kind of
“gigantic condom”. Architectural experts are also impressed:
LAVA was presented at the World Urban Forum with the Re-
Skinning Award, part of the UN sponsored ZEROprize, for its
UTS Tower design. The award honours “market-disrupting improvements
in the design and development of retrofi tting and
re-skinning technologies that improve the energy effi ciency and
habitability of older buildings”.
All that remains now is for UTS to give the go-ahead.
There are already plans and fi nancing for redeveloping the city
campus; the burning question now is whether the university has
the innovative daring to implement the tower skin project. First,
however, it intends to spend AUD 120 million on a new Business
School designed by Frank Gehry. Yet when Gehry was at a podium
discussion in Sydney, the fi rst question from the fl oor was:
“Why don’t you help us do something about the awful Broadway
Tower instead?”